Take a look at this short video:
Zoe Weil
Author of Most Good, Least Harm: A Simple Principle for a Better World and Meaningful Life and Above All, Be Kind
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
“There is an old Cherokee story about a grandfather who is teaching his grandson about life. He says to his grandson, ‘A fight is going on inside me. It is a terrible fight between two wolves. One is evil; he is anger, envy, greed, arrogance, self-pity, resentment, and superiority. The other is good; he is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, generosity, and compassion. This same fight is going on inside you, and inside every other person, too.’
The grandson thinks about this for a minute and then asks his grandfather, ‘Which wolf will win?’
The old Cherokee simply replies, ‘The one we feed.’”
Likewise, there’s an activity that a graduate of IHE, Kimberly Korona, created, and which I use when I give presentations on compassionate activism. The gist of the activity, called Human Picture, is to have two sets of words describing emotions written on pieces of paper. The first set have words like hatred, anger, despair, hopelessness, fear, and self-righteousness. The second set have words like loving, compassionate, joyful, hopeful, empowered, and understanding.
For the activity, I have volunteers take one of the first sets of words, go up to the front and strike a pose, becoming a frozen statue that reflects the emotion of that word. When everyone in the first set is posed, they form a human picture of anger, despair, hatred, etc. I then have a second set of volunteers do the same thing — this time with the other set of words, so that they end up forming a human picture of hope, joy, compassion, etc.
I ask the audience to give their reaction to each picture and to talk about how they felt about each one. Obviously, everyone prefers the second human picture. I tell everyone that the point of the activity is to help us remember that what we feel on the inside reflects on the outside. So, if we’re full of hatred and anger and despair and fear and hopelessness, that will reflect in our lives and our choices….just as in the Cherokee story, the wolf that we feed will be the wolf that wins.
In a world so full of violence, destruction, suffering, and cruelty, it’s so easy to wrap ourselves in a bubble of those same kinds of emotions. It’s hard to be patient with those making choices that harm others. It’s challenging to feel compassion instead of to judge. It’s excruciating sometimes, to feel love instead of anger and hatred. But, if we truly want a compassionate, joyful, just, sustainable world, then we must live that human picture and feed that wolf.
~ Marsha
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
Q: Dan, there's been a lot of talk lately about "merit pay" for schoolteachers - that is, tying teacher salaries to student performance, especially on standardized tests. What do you think of this approach?
A: A few years ago, I thought this was a great idea. Incentivize teachers and then pay the outstanding ones more? What could be wrong with that? It's logical, straightforward, and fair. However, after looking at 50 years of research on human motivation for DRIVE, I've changed my mind. I think that this approach, despite is surface appeal, has more flaws than strengths - and that there's a simpler, more effective alternative.
Here's my reasoning:
For starters, most proposals for "merit pay" (sorry, I can't use the term without quotation marks) tie teacher compensation to student scores on standardized tests. That's a disaster. It focuses teachers almost single-mindedly on training their students to pencil in correct answers on multiple choice tests - and turns classrooms into test prep academies. (What's more, it can encourage cheating, as Georgia's experience shows.) So let's knock out this approach to merit pay.
A second option is for school principals to decide who gets performance bonuses. Again, there's a certain theoretical appeal to this method. But I've yet to meet a teacher who considers it fair, let alone motivating. Teachers worry that principals don't have sufficient information to make such decisions and that "merit pay" would be based too heavily on who's best at playing politics and currying favor. So let's kibosh this method, too.
A third approach is to use a variety metrics to determine who gets a bonus. You could measure teacher performance using: standardized scores for that teacher's students; evaluations of the teacher's peers, students, parents, and principal; a teacher's contribution to overall school performance; time devoted to professional development; how much the teachers' students improved over the previous year; and so on. This isn't necessarily a bad idea. But it has a huge downside: It would force resource-strapped schools to spend enormous amounts of time, talent, and brainpower measuring teachers rather than educating students. Schools have enough to do already. And the costs of establishing and maintaining elaborate measurement systems would likely outweigh the benefits.
In short, I can't see a way to construct a merit pay scheme that is both simple and fair. What's more, it strikes me as slightly delusional to think that people who've intentionally chosen to pursue a career for public-spirited, rather than economic, reasons will suddenly work harder because they're offered a few hundred extra dollars. Truth be told, most teachers work pretty damn hard already.
Fortunately, I think there's an easier and more elegant solution - one that's also supported by the science of human motivation.
First, we should raise the base pay of teachers. Too many talented people opt out of this career because they're concerned about supporting their families. For prospective teachers, raising base salaries would remove an obstacle to entering the profession. For existing teachers, it's a way to recognize the importance of their jobs without resorting to behavior-distorting carrots and sticks. The science reveals a paradox about money and motivation: In most cases, the best use of money as a motivator is to pay people enough to take the issue of money off the table. Raising base salaries would help take the issue of money off the table. Instead of fretting about paying their bills on an insufficient salary or scheming to get a small bonus, teachers could focus on the work they love.
At the same time, we have to make it easier to get rid of bad teachers. Teaching, like any profession, has its share of duds. Showing these folks the door, which now is quite difficult, is the right thing to do. It's better for students, of course. But it's also better for the teachers who remain. Just as it's very motivating to have great colleagues, it's incredibly de-motivating to have lazy or incompetent ones.
So . . . if I could wave a magic wand, I'd dispense with elaborate and complicated "merit pay" schemes for teachers. Instead, I'd raise teachers' base pay and make it easier to get rid of bad teachers. That solution is simpler, fairer, and much more consistent with what truly motivates high performance.
"People's conference" calls for systemic changes to global warming action (via Grist) (4/25/10)
U.S. reexamines opposition to UN declaration for indigenous rights (via Alternet) (4/24/10)
Students take on plastics problem (via AZ Central) (4/23/10)
New book confirms "fish feel pain" (via Psychology Today) (4/23/10)
"The problem with factory farms" - interview w/ Animal Factories author (via Time) (4/23/10)
Americans still eating food laced with chemicals banned "decades ago" (via Alternet) (4/22/10)
More schools urging parents to leave kids in school for "Take Our Daughters and Sons to Work Day" (via AP) (4/22/10)
Some U.S. states moving to legalize horse slaughter for human consumption (via Audubon) (4/21/10)
Supreme Court rules against ban on depictions of animal cruelty (via Christian Science Monitor) (4/20/10)
"How not to raise a bully: the early roots of empathy" (via Time) (4/17/10)
Keep up with more humane issues in the news via our Facebook or Twitter pages.
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.“We know that way of life can’t support a population in the billions, so trying to go back to it would require the death of most of the world’s people. Beyond that, I think it’s obvious that nature is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Humanity, Inc. We have the capacity to take it down with us if we choose, and people are put into desperate situations will do just that. There’s this sort of college-town anarchist idea that if we let it all fall apart, out of the ruins will come something clean and noncommercial and egalitarian and more in touch with nature, but that’s just crazy. Hungry people don’t think about the future. As my colleague Allan AtKisson says, a world of starving people will be a world without panda bears, dolphins, or rain forests. By the time we got back to the Stone Age, we wouldn’t have the same world we had during the Stone Age. We can’t go back; there’s no ‘back’ to go back to.”Steffen insists that it’s equally deluded to believe that technology will “magically find a way to let us continue living wasteful, suburban lives based on throwaway consumption.” To me, this means we need to find a way to move forward, and that will happen when we don’t romanticize the past as a perfect template for a viable future and we don’t cling to the present as an ideal to spread across the globe, but rather begin to envision a world in which we are all able to live joyful, healthy, meaningful lives which meet our physical and emotional needs peaceably and sustainably. Yes, this is indeed hard to imagine. For some, it may seem unimaginable. But what else should we do than make the effort to imagine such a world and put legs on our vision?
“Optimism is a political act. Those who benefit from the status quo are perfectly happy for us to think nothing is going to get any better. In fact, these days, cynicism is obedience. What’s really radical is being willing to look right at the problems we face and still insist that we can solve them."I don’t pretend to know how to solve all our problems or how to change the many systems (economic, political, energy, agricultural, legal, commercial, etc.) that perpetuate them. I do know, however, that there is one system whose transformation will lead to changes in all the other systems. That system is education. If we as a society redefine the purpose of schooling and provide all students with the knowledge, tools, and inspiration to themselves envision a sustainable and peaceful world, then these young people will bring that knowledge, those tools, and their enthusiasm into all the professions they enter, transforming each in turn.
I’ve discovered through some of my own letter-writing to officials that issues (and better solutions to problems) that I assumed they would already know about are frequently unknown to them. I’ve learned not to make assumptions about what people at any level of authority know and to do what I can to help educate, inspire and empower them…and to offer positive suggestions and praise as often as I express my concerns and complaints.
Whenever we take the time and courage to speak our piece about a MOGO world to others – including those in major decision-making roles – we help create that just, compassionate, sustainable world we seek.
Try to make it a habit to regularly write letters and emails to legislators, officials, editors and others who can help enact decisions that can bring about positive systemic change.
If the thought of writing a letter or email makes your palms all sweaty, just use your favorite web search engine to look for "letter writing tips activists" (or something similar), and you'll find some good advice from a variety of non-profit groups.
Letter-writing is a great skill to teach young people, too. It's important that they know the power their words and views have to create a just, compassionate, sustainable world.
Let your voice be heard: Write right now! It only takes a few minutes!
~ Marsha
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
Polls find majority of Americans want "clean energy reform" (via Treehugger) (4/20/10)
Environmental science teacher inspires students, wins award (via Seattle Times) (4/19/10)
12-year-old girl teaches village children what she learns at school (via GOOD) (4/19/10)
"How the top 5 supermarkets waste food" (via Alternet) (4/18/10)
"Alternate path for teacher education gains ground" (via NY Times) (4/18/10)
Former USDA official calls for ban on livestock antibiotics used for "nontherapeutic use" (via NY Times) (4/17/10)
Amazon deforestation"down 51% from this time last year" (via Treehugger) (4/17/10)
More young designers using fur (via Audubon) (4/17/10)
EU to improve regulations for "lab animal welfare" (via BBC) (4/16/10)
Insurance companies own billions in fast food and tobacco stocks (via ABC) (4/16/10)
School brings philosophical discussions to 2nd graders (via NY Times) (4/8/10)
Online courses gaining ground (via NY Times) (4/8/10)
TV shows integrating "behavior placement" to encourage earth-friendly choices (via Wall Street Journal) (4/7/10)
60% of Malaysian shoppers "embrace ethical shopping" (via Business Times) (3/24/10)
Keep up with more humane issues in the news via our Facebook or Twitter pages.
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
"When donating to charitable causes, people do not value lives consistently. Money is often concentrated on a single victim even though more people would be helped if resources were dispersed or spent protecting future victims."What does this mean for Humane Education? I think it reaffirms the importance of personal connection. We protect what we love, and we love what we know. We can tell people all we want about the numbers and watch their eyes glaze over and their attention wander. Or, we can share the stories of individuals. We can help them get to know Drussa the boy sold into slavery to work a cocoa bean plantation so that we can have our chocolate bar; Freedom the cow, who became a friend instead of food; Luna the tree has lived for hundreds of years and helped nurture an ecosystem and raised consciousness about the preciousness of the natural world (and the power of a few to make a positive difference). We can inspire people to care by showing them how we're all connected, one relationship at a time, and help them get the "warm glow" that many people crave for doing good by showing them the positive effects their actions create.
In living a healthy, balanced MOGO life, it’s also important to ADD positive things to our lives — things that bring us balance and joy and meaning. Whether that means spending more time in nature, taking time to pursue a hobby, connecting more with friends and loved ones, pursuing a spiritual practice, volunteering for worthy causes, or sharing what we’ve learned with others, focusing on adding good to our lives is just as important a part of MOGO than ridding ourselves of harmful habits.
My husband and I have been more focused on adding “good” to our lives – to doing more that’s positive, healthy, and restorative, and less that’s stressful, lacking in meaning and not aligned with our values. One strategy that we use to help us is something we call 10/30: we choose one positive thing that we want to add to our lives and do it every day for 30 days for at least 10 minutes a day.
The first month we tried this strategy, my husband, John, chose drawing, something that he loved to do when he was younger and has longed to begin again. I chose practicing my guitar, something I’ve managed to alternately pursue briefly and neglect excessively for many years. In adding activities like these, both of us found a great deal of joy and fulfillment, and we're slowly whittling away the clutter and adding more good stuff.
Of course, there are a lot of ways to add something new and MOGO to your life, so consider what healthy, sustainable, restorative, positive, life-affirming MOGO action you could take. You could try the 10/30 experiment, or something else that better resonates with you.
~ MarshaCurrent hometown: Winnipeg, Manitoba (Canada)
IHE fan since: 2008
Current job: Many! Mom - currently on maternity leave from Youth Programs Coordinator position at the Winnipeg Art Gallery; freelance drama teacher.
Book/movie that changed your life: End of the Century: The Story of the Ramones
Guilty pleasure: Video games - especially role playing games.
Inspired by: children, nature, art
Love about yourself: positive, approachable, kind
One of your strengths: perseverance
IHE: What led you to the path of humane education?
KT: I actually read a review that Zoe (IHE's president) had written about Amanda Soule's book, The Creative Family. I searched the Institute for Humane Education (IHE), and it was the greatest educational idea I had heard. I had never planned on doing a masters degree before but seeing the program changed my mind. I had been teaching and looking for a way to make my teaching more valuable, to take it further. I was teaching creative drama and repeatedly telling parents and other teachers that I wasn't teaching drama to train actors; I was teaching drama to help develop confident and creative people. What I have discovered though my M.Ed. studies is that I was slightly incorporating humane education into my classes beforehand. IHE's program has given me the confidence to take it further more confidently.
IHE: You’ve been involved in drama and theater for many years. What drew you to the stage, and to teaching kids about acting and drama?
KW: I have been in the drama classroom for 13 years. After a successful high school internship I was hired to be a school registrar at a local theatre school; part of the job required me to be a teacher's assistant. I enjoyed assisting in the classroom and started to learn how to teach drama. I moved up to team teaching and then developed and taught my own classes.
I love live theatre because it is an intangible moment. So much of our world is about getting and collecting stuff; theatre offers an experience. You cannot relive theatre, even if you see the same play with the exact same cast the next day -- it will have changed. It is an experience that demands (if it is good theatre) your attention and makes you sit down and focus on the story being told. You can't really multi-task theatre.
I teach drama because it is something I am naturally good at and because I believe it helps develop the part of humans that I most admire. I am saddened when children are asked "If you could have any super power in the world, what would it be?" and the answer is Batman, Spider-man, or Powerpuff Girls. Many children are so immersed in consumer culture that their play features reenactments of the last movie they saw. If children cannot confidently create and express their own ideas, from their very own imaginations, I am concerned about the types of adults they will turn into.
IHE: Since pursuing your M.Ed. in Humane Education, you’ve been integrating humane education issues and concepts into your work teaching drama to youth. In what ways do you integrate those issues, and what has been the response by kids, their parents, and the audiences who see their work?
KW: I teach a class callled "Mrs. Twigg's Surprising Suitcase" for children ages 6-8. At the first class, the students enter the classroom with my assistant and do attendance. I am hiding in a large train trunk in the classroom. After attendance, I make a ruckus in the trunk and come out. All the students are told is that I was locked in the trunk by someone who didn't like that I was helping others. That is all we both know and from there we create a story. First they decided as a group where it happened; in this case they chose a planet they named Ahioterme pttb. The next class was dedicated to the environment; they decided what the air was like, vegetation, if there was garbage, how was stuff made. The next class we explored the animals -- how are they treated, do they get eaten, do they work, are the animals in charge of themselves or is another being in charge of them? On another class we explored the conditions of the other planetary inhabitants and their history and culture. We built an entire world based on their ideas. The result of the most recent class ended with a play about a factory that was manufacturing oil feathers that poisoned the planet and the animals. The factory workers were young girls and an attempt was made by the animals and other children to rescue them, which ended in a court hearing. We managed to cover child labour and social justice, and it was fun.
At the end of the term the children performed their favorite parts of the story for an audience of about 100 people. Before the performance, I explained the storymaking process to the audience. When I announced that the play was about slave workers and social justice, the audience laughed. The children received positive feedback on the play itself. Some of the children plan on taking the class again, because the story will change based on the participants. Many parents remarked that their child had fun in class but never spoke to me about the content.
IHE: What have been your successes and challenges in combining drama and humane education?
KT: In my experience, children want to explore humane education. They hear about global warming and animals being hurt -- no one is talking to them about it and it can be scary and confusing. Drama is a way of working through some of these touchy areas creatively. Drama allows the students to confront a situation fictionally and try out different problem solving solutions safely.
The limitations of my current work are that parents did not sign their kids up for a "humane" drama class, so humane issues cannot be my focus. Also, on the day we did the child factory workers, I played the role of the factory owner. At the end, as I was being led away to jail I asked, "How do you stop children from being forced to work on your planet?", and the children were shocked. They insisted that it did not happen on earth. We talked about how they could prevent it on earth, and what they could do about it if they found out it did happen on earth. But, I did not push it further with them, because firstly, they simply didn't seem prepared to hear it, and secondly, it was not what their parents had signed them up for.
I would really like to offer humane drama classes, and I am trying to find the right wording and venue for such a course. I think parents do want their kids to be educated and explore every subject in humane education, but how do I market such a course as meaningful, inspiring and fun?
IHE: Last year you wrote a play specifically focused on humane education issues for a playwriting contest that was part of the Carol Shields Festival of New Work and won first prize in the professional division. Tell us about that experience and what the play is about. What are your plans for the play?
KW: The experience was rewarding, and the award helped me pay tuition! Previous to writing the play I had been keeping what I was learning in the humane education courses separate from any of my creative work. Humane issues were linked to my teaching practice and that was it. But, as I sat down to write a play, all the issues I had been exploring in the courses kept popping up in my head and out of the characters' mouths. I realized that playwriting was another way I could educate.
The contest was to write a play in 90 minutes, and it had to contain certain phrases and places, One of them was Paris Hilton's birthday. The play is a one-act play about a couple who decide to live inside their apartment for one year -- no internet, radio, television or going out -- after they are disgusted by all the coverage of Paris Hilton's birthday. The only contact they have is with Brian, a friend who delivers their food to them once a week. The play touches on animal rights: the couple is vegan and Brian is not -- he has a lot to learn; on culture: is it socially responsible to bubble yourself off? How far do we have to go to keep marketing out of our lives?; on environment: consuming less, becoming aware of one's garbage (Brian will only take one small bag of garbage down a week, and they have nowhere else to store garbage.)
One of the plus sides to their experiment is that the male character learns to listen. As the months go on and tension rises between the couple, he ends up sleeping on the living room floor. Desperate for new interaction he hears his neighbor speaking from the other side of the wall; she reads aloud, and this becomes his nightly entertainment. Every night he sets his pillows and blanket up against the wall and gives a light knock, and then she begins to speak. On the final night of their one year experiment, he sets his pillow and blanket up beside the wall for the last story and hears her choking. He is unable to rescue her (no phone, no keys), but she manages to die with notice and a friend.
The play is still in its first draft, and I have a bit of editing to do. I am going to submit the play to a few theatres and see if any of them are interested in workshopping or producing it. If not, we have a popular local fringe festival where I have self-produced work before. I also intend to format it into a screen format, because I think it could make a nice short film. My husband is a video artist, and since the story is set in one apartment, it would be easy to shoot ourselves.
IHE: For your M.Ed. thesis, you’re writing a play about activism for young people. Tell us about that experience. What’s your goal for the play?
KT: I am finding it challenging to create a play on a specific theme. My previous plays have started off as a basic premise and evolved from there, and this play has limits and a specific agenda. I am not interested in writing a traditional educational play; I am hoping to sneak information into the play, without the audience feeling the play has an agenda. My goal for the play is to create a piece of engaging theatre that motivates youth to take action. In addition to the play, I am also creating a five-day drama workshop that accompanies the performance. Some people are motivated by watching and others are motivated by doing.
IHE: What advice would you give to others who might want to integrate humane education into their passion for theater?
KT: I don't know if I can give advice on this yet, as I am just beginning to do this myself. The arts are an ideal place to integrate humane education, since most of the arts explore the human condition already. It is important to keep your audience in mind. The reason my play won was not because it was edgy or controversial; it was because it was well written and touched on issues people think about often, and it didn't answer all the questions. It showed human imperfection, and it did not point fingers. I have seen plays that are "issues" plays, and I found them boring and insulting. Entertain first. Also, a single play cannot give all the information in all the areas of humane education, so pick one or two to touch on. If you are successful, your audience will follow and hear about other issues in your next work.
IHE: Any future plans, dreams or projects?
KT: Right now, I am focusing on getting my thesis written and watching my new baby grow up too fast! I want to get better at marketing my playwriting work and create humane drama workshops locally.
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
Got some extra time on your hands? (It's the final season of Lost, so that should help.) There are plenty of people and organizations that need volunteers. You can browse local sites for opportunities, or peruse websites such as Volunteer Match, the HandsOn Network, and Idealist. If you’re looking for a way to help your community while making your heart sing, check sites like these out.
~ Marsha
Like our blog? Please share it with others, comment, and/or subscribe to our RSS feed.
Anti-government "patriot" groups on the rise (via Newsweek) (4/13/10)
Images from the Great Pacific Garbage Patch (via Daily Green) (4/13/10)
Lawsuit accuses U.S. egg industry of price-fixing (via ABC) (4/12/10)
"Gombe 50" anniversary interview with Jane Goodall (via Mongabay) (4/12/10)
Poll shows "environmental activism declining" (via Treehugger) (4/12/10)
Hawaii factory fish farming to increase by 900% (via Treehugger) (4/11/10)
Report on Ohio factory farming ballot initiative (via CNN) (4/10/10)
Green design reaching affordable housing (via LA Times) (4/10/10)
EU "eco-friendly" certified paper actually causing deforestation, extinction, harm to indigenous peoples (via Treehugger) (4/10/10)
"Fighting Sioux nickname to be retired in North Dakota (via Huffington Post) (4/9/10)
Group's new study says avoid antibacterial products (via MNN) (4/9/10)
"Global chronic hunger rises above 1 billion" (via Worldwatch) (4/8/10)
"Finland's education success" (video) (via BBC) (4/6/10)
"1/4 of Rocky Gray Wolves Killed in First Hunting Season in Decades" (via Treehugger) (4/5/10)
U.S. eats more packaged/processed foods than people in other countries (via NY Times) (4/3/10)
"Maryland launches Genuine Progress Indicator" (via Yes!) (4/2/10)
Keep up with more humane issues in the news via our Facebook or Twitter pages.